Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the README excerpt from honojs/hono in the repository data:

honojs/hono shows strong activity signals:

• 31,529 stars and 1,196 forks
• GitHub commit activity badge (shows monthly commits)
• GitHub last commit badge (tracks recency)
• codecov badge (active testing/coverage tracking)
• Active Discord community (1011308539819597844 server listed)

However, the repository data provided doesn't include comparable metrics or RepoPilot analysis signals for vitejs/vite that would let me make a direct quantitative comparison between the two repos.

To give you a definitive answer about which has better maintenance signals, I'd need:

• Star/fork counts for vitejs/vite
• RepoPilot's import graph analysis, architecture grade, or security/dependency signals for both repos
• Recent commit frequency or issue/PR activity for comparison

The honojs/hono data shows it's well-maintained (multiple badge indicators for CI, commits, coverage), but without equivalent metrics for vitejs/vite in this context, I cannot conclusively say which project has superior maintenance signals.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What are vitejs/vite's GitHub stars and fork counts?
• Does RepoPilot analysis show architecture grades for both?
• How do their dependency vulnerability profiles compare?