Question
Which has better activity and maintenance signals?
Which has better activity and maintenance signals?
About infinilabs/analysis-ik · 2 messages · last activity 9/5/2026
RepoPilot
Based on the RepoPilot analysis in the repository data:
infinilabs/analysis-ik has stronger maintenance signals:
- Verdict: GO — Strong maintenance signals
- The README notes the plugin is "Maintained and supported with ❤️ by INFINI Labs"
- Active CI/CD with GitHub Actions testing across multiple Elasticsearch versions (9.0.0, 9.0.7, 9.1.0, 9.1.4) and JDK versions (21, 24) [.github/workflows/test.yml:L1-L40]
- High community engagement: 17,516 stars and 3,274 forks indicate sustained user interest
lmax-exchange/disruptor has no explicit maintenance verdict provided in the analysis data.
However, infinilabs/analysis-ik has weaknesses worth noting:
- OpenSSF Scorecard: only 3.7/10, with critical gaps in Dependency-Update-Tool (0/10), Security-Policy (0/10), and SAST (0/10)
- Architecture grade: C (50/100)
The data doesn't include comparable RepoPilot signals for Disruptor, so I can only conclude that analysis-ik explicitly declares strong maintenance via its verdict and the README, while Disruptor's maintenance status is unstated in the provided data.
FOLLOW_UPS:
- What is Disruptor's maintenance status and scorecard?
- Why does analysis-ik lack a security policy?
- How frequently are analysis-ik releases published?
Want to ask your own question?
Open chat for infinilabs/analysis-ikPublic Q&A. Generated by RepoPilot from the actual source of infinilabs/analysis-ik. AI answers can be incomplete or stale — verify before relying on them.