Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis provided, I can only assess kerryjiang/supersocket since it's the one with computed signals in the repository_data block.

kerryjiang/supersocket signals:

• Architecture grade: A (100/100) — 13 files parsed, 0 import cycles, clean dependency structure
• Dependency security: 0 critical/high/moderate CVEs across 75 npm dependencies; 0 in direct dependencies
• Verdict: GO — Healthy across all four use cases
• Community metrics: 4232 stars, 1165 forks

However, weakness areas flagged:

• OpenSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10 — notably weak in:
  • Dependency-Update-Tool (0/10)
  • Security-Policy (0/10)
  • SAST (0/10)

This indicates the SuperSocket project has solid code architecture and no known security vulnerabilities in dependencies, but lags in automated security practices (no documented security policy, no automated dependency updates, no static analysis tooling).

For reactiveui/refit: No RepoPilot analysis was provided in the data block, so I cannot make a direct maintenance comparison. To assess Refit's activity signals, you'd need its own computed analysis or to check GitHub directly for commit frequency, release cadence, and issue response times.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What's SuperSocket's recent release frequency?
• Does Refit have published security advisories or policies?
• How many open issues does each project have?