Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the repository data provided, I can compare maintenance signals:

koajs/koa:

• Stars & community size: 35,693 stars, 3,231 forks — substantially larger following
• Version maturity: Currently at v3.2.1 [package.json:L2], indicating active development with major version releases
• Recent changes: The History.md file shows documented releases and fixes across multiple versions, with entries going back several years
• Test infrastructure: Modern test setup using Node's built-in node:test module [tests/request/query.test.js:L2-L3], suggesting recent modernization efforts
• Build tooling: Active maintenance with build scripts and linting [package.json:L15-L20]

trekhleb/javascript-algorithms: The repository data provided shows primarily algorithm implementation examples (Caesar cipher, Dijkstra, rail-fence cipher, seam carving) but does not include explicit version numbers, release history, or recent commit metadata that would indicate maintenance signals.

Verdict: Based on the available data, koajs/koa demonstrates stronger activity and maintenance signals with:

• Clear version progression (v3.2.1)
• Documented release history
• Modern tooling adoption
• Active test coverage

However, without comparative version numbers, release dates, or commit frequency data for trekhleb/javascript-algorithms in the provided data, I cannot make a definitive maintenance comparison between the two repos.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• When was koajs/koa last released?
• What Node.js versions does koa currently support?
• How is trekhleb/javascript-algorithms structured?