Question
Which has better activity and maintenance signals?
Which has better activity and maintenance signals?
About lingochamp/filedownloader · 2 messages · last activity 9/6/2026
RepoPilot
Based on the RepoPilot analysis signals:
lingochamp/filedownloader has significantly poorer maintenance signals:
- Verdict: WAIT — Stale — last commit 2 years ago
- OpenSSF Scorecard: 2.8/10 with critical weaknesses:
- Maintained: 0/10
- Dependency-Update-Tool: 0/10
- Security-Policy: 0/10
- Architecture grade: C (50/100) with 0 files parsed
The README itself acknowledges this stagnation: "Because of FileDownloader unit-test coverage is very low, so all farther features and enhances will be achieved on the okdownload instead of FileDownloader, and FileDownloader will only focuses on bug fixes" — indicating the project is in maintenance-only mode, with active development moved to FileDownloader2/okdownload.
wasabeef/android-gpuimage — No maintenance signals provided in the RepoPilot analysis, so I cannot make a direct comparison. However, the absence of explicit stale/maintenance warnings suggests potentially better activity than filedownloader's documented 2-year dormancy.
Recommendation: If you need active development and modern maintenance, avoid lingochamp/filedownloader and consider the successor okdownload project instead. For android-gpuimage, you'd need to check its commit history and issue responsiveness separately.
FOLLOW_UPS:
- What is the okdownload project's maintenance status?
- Does android-gpuimage have recent commits or activity?
- What are the specific maintenance concerns for your use case?
Want to ask your own question?
Open chat for lingochamp/filedownloaderPublic Q&A. Generated by RepoPilot from the actual source of lingochamp/filedownloader. AI answers can be incomplete or stale — verify before relying on them.