Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis provided:

openemu/openemu shows: WAIT — Slowing — last commit 7mo ago

This indicates the project has slowed significantly, with no commits for 7 months. This is a maintenance concern signal.

Unfortunately, the repository_data block does not include RepoPilot analysis for runjuu/inputsourcepro, so I cannot make a direct comparison of its activity and maintenance signals with concrete metrics.

However, what I can observe from the code samples:

• openemu/openemu code references modern Swift features (like @objc dynamic, lazy properties, os_log) and appears well-structured [OpenEmu/AboutViewController.swift:L36-L75], but the 7-month gap without commits is a clear red flag for ongoing maintenance.
• runjuu/inputsourcepro shows active use of Combine framework patterns (.assign(to:&) syntax, .sink(), .store(in:)) [Input Source Pro/Models/IndicatorVM.swift:L246-L285], which suggests more recent Swift development practices, but without RepoPilot data, I cannot confirm its commit cadence.

Verdict: Based on available signals, openemu/openemu's 7-month inactivity suggests weaker maintenance. For inputsourcepro's activity status, you'd need to check its commit history directly or await additional analysis data.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• When was inputsourcepro's last commit?
• Does openemu/openemu have active issue resolution?
• How many open PRs does each repo have?