Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis provided, ordinals/ord shows strong maintenance signals with a "GO — Healthy across the board" verdict. However, I can only see a high-level health assessment for ordinals/ord in the data provided.

For sharkdp/bat, no RepoPilot analysis summary was included in the repository data, so I cannot make a direct comparative statement about its maintenance health.

From the raw statistics visible in the data:

• ordinals/ord: 3,969 stars, 1,479 forks (a mature project with active community engagement)

The ordinals/ord README also indicates active maintenance—it mentions a lead maintainer (raphjaph) whose work is community-funded, and there's an active Discord community and project board tracking prioritized issues.

For a complete comparison of maintenance activity between both repos, I'd need RepoPilot signals for sharkdp/bat (dependency advisories, commit frequency, issue response time, etc.).

FOLLOW_UPS:

• Does ordinals/ord have open security advisories?
• What's the commit frequency in each repo?
• When was the last release for each project?