Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis in the repository data:

ossu/computer-science shows stronger maintenance signals:

• Verdict: GO — Healthy across the board — this is the authoritative verdict
• Clean dependency security: 0 dependencies scanned, 0 CVEs
• Active changelog tracking updates (see CHANGELOG.md with recent additions like "Essence of Linear Algebra" and contributor guidelines)
• Clear governance with CONTRIBUTING.md defining community roles (e.g., emoji reactions on issues)

practical-tutorials/project-based-learning shows automation-driven maintenance but less detail in the provided data:

• Robust CI/CD workflows for link validation (.github/workflows/validate-pr.yml) and stale PR management (.github/workflows/stale-prs.yml)
• Sophisticated link-rot tracking system (.link-rot-state.json)
• However, the RepoPilot analysis wasn't provided for this repo in the data block

In summary: ossu/computer-science has an explicit "GO" verdict with documented healthy signals across dependency security and community governance. practical-tutorials/project-based-learning shows strong automated maintenance infrastructure, but comparative health signals aren't included in the provided data.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What curriculum topics does ossu/computer-science prioritize?
• How are broken links detected in project-based-learning?
• What are ossu/computer-science's course selection criteria?