Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis signals provided:

pqpo/smartcropper shows weaker maintenance signals:

• OpenSSF Scorecard: 1.4/10 — very low
• CI-Tests: 0/10 — no automated testing infrastructure
• Dependency-Update-Tool: 0/10 — no dependency update automation
• Security-Policy: 0/10 — no documented security policy
• Architecture grade: C (50/100)

The README mentions the project is seeking collaboration ("有意向合作的请联系邮箱：pqponet@gmail.com") and references an older sample APK, suggesting activity may have slowed.

reactivex/rxandroid shows significantly better maintenance signals:

• Active release cadence visible in [CHANGES.md], with version 3.0.2 released November 2022 and 3.0.1 the day prior
• Documented release process in [RELEASING.md:L1-L18]
• Dependabot automation configured in [.github/dependabot.yaml:L1-L8]
• Contributing guidelines documented in [CONTRIBUTING.md:L7-L30]
• Explicit dependency management strategy (README advises tracking RxJava updates)

Verdict: reactivex/rxandroid demonstrates substantially better maintenance activity and engineering practices. It has automated tooling, documented processes, and recent releases, whereas pqpo/smartcropper lacks CI/CD signals and security infrastructure.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• When was pqpo/smartcropper last updated or released?
• Does reactivex/rxandroid have open issues or active PRs?
• What testing framework does pqpo/smartcropper use?