Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis provided in the repository data:

scwang90/smartrefreshlayout shows a WAIT — Stale verdict with the last commit 1 year ago, indicating the project is no longer actively maintained.

sofastack/sofa-boot does not have a stale verdict mentioned in the analysis. The repository data includes recent code patterns (Apache license headers, modern Spring Boot integration patterns) and the README references current features and best practices, suggesting active maintenance.

sofastack/sofa-boot has better activity and maintenance signals. It appears to be an actively maintained enterprise framework, whereas scwang90/smartrefreshlayout has not received updates for a year and should be considered dormant if you're evaluating it for new projects.

If you're considering scwang90/smartrefreshlayout for production use, the year-old codebase and lack of recent maintenance are risk factors worth accounting for—especially for Android framework libraries where platform changes can introduce compatibility issues.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What are the direct dependencies of smartrefreshlayout?
• Does sofa-boot require specific Spring Boot versions?
• Are there known security advisories for either project?