Which has better activity and maintenance signals?

Based on the RepoPilot analysis signals in the repository data:

tencent/shadow shows a "GO" verdict — Healthy across all four use cases. This is the strongest signal available in the data, indicating good overall project health across reliability, dependency fit, software assurance, and adoption dimensions.

However, the repository data doesn't include explicit RepoPilot analysis for xuxueli/xxl-job, so I can't make a direct comparison using the same computed signals.

From the README text alone, I can observe:

• tencent/shadow [README.md:L49-L57] mentions automated testing with specific Android API versions (API 28, API 19) and Gradle/AGP compatibility testing in CI workflows, suggesting active maintenance infrastructure.

• xuxueli/xxl-job [README.md:L124-L163] documents a long development history with significant production adoption at companies like Meituan (大众点评), and notes it received "G-Star project graduation certification" in 2024, which is a positive signal.

To make a confident comparison on activity and maintenance, I'd need:

• Current commit frequency or last-commit timestamps
• Open/closed issue response rates
• Contributor activity trends
• Release cadence

The RepoPilot "GO" verdict for shadow is stronger evidence than the historical README notes for xxl-job, but this doesn't necessarily reflect current activity levels—only overall health signals.

FOLLOW_UPS:

• What's the recent commit history for both projects?
• Which has more active open pull requests currently?
• How do release schedules compare between the two?