game1024/openspeedy vs jquense/yup
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, openspeedy and yup both show mixed maintenance signals. openspeedy last saw a commit 4 months ago with 1+ active contributor, while yup last saw a commit 1 month ago with 27+ active contributors. openspeedy is GPL-3.0-licensed while yup is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
game1024/openspeedy
Solo project — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
jquense/yup
OpenSSF Scorecard says this is unmaintained
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| openspeedy | yup | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15,823 | 23,674 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 3 | 251 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 51% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? game1024/openspeedy · jquense/yup
Ask AI about game1024/openspeedy vs jquense/yup
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.