hackmdio/codimd vs phaserjs/phaser
phaserjs/phaser shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, phaser shows healthier maintenance signals than codimd. phaser rates Healthy overall while codimd rates Mixed. codimd last saw a commit 8 months ago with 11+ active contributors, while phaser was committed to 3 days ago with 7+ active contributors. codimd is AGPL-3.0-licensed while phaser is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hackmdio/codimd →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7mo ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
phaserjs/phaser →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| codimd | phaser | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 10,059 | 39,846 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 3d ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 350 | 114 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 19% | 5% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? hackmdio/codimd · phaserjs/phaser
Ask AI about hackmdio/codimd vs phaserjs/phaser
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.