hyprwm/hyprland vs id-software/doom
hyprwm/hyprland shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hyprland shows healthier maintenance signals than doom. hyprland rates Healthy overall while doom rates Mixed. hyprland last saw a commit 1 month ago with 30+ active contributors, while doom last saw a commit 2 years ago with 2+ active contributors. hyprland is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while doom is GPL-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hyprwm/hyprland →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
id-software/doom →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hyprland | doom | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 35,578 | 18,664 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Open issues | 185 | 13 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 23% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? hyprwm/hyprland · id-software/doom
Ask AI about hyprwm/hyprland vs id-software/doom
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.