id-software/doom vs lizardbyte/sunshine
lizardbyte/sunshine shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, sunshine shows healthier maintenance signals than doom. sunshine rates Healthy overall while doom rates Mixed. doom last saw a commit 2 years ago with 2+ active contributors, while sunshine last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors. doom is GPL-2.0-licensed while sunshine is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
id-software/doom →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lizardbyte/sunshine →
Healthy across the board
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| doom | sunshine | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,664 | 36,974 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 13 | 106 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 47% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? id-software/doom · lizardbyte/sunshine
Ask AI about id-software/doom vs lizardbyte/sunshine
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.