nickemanarin/screentogif vs qianmo/unity-design-pattern
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, screentogif and unity-design-pattern both show mixed maintenance signals. screentogif last saw a commit 1 month ago with 13+ active contributors, while unity-design-pattern last saw a commit 6 years ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
nickemanarin/screentogif
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MS-PL); no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MS-PL) — review terms
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MS-PL licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
qianmo/unity-design-pattern
Stale — last commit 7y ago
last commit was 7y ago; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 7y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓3 active contributors
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Fork & modify Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| screentogif | unity-design-pattern | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 27,590 | 4,673 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 6y ago |
| License | MS-PL | Unknown |
| Open issues | 331 | 5 |
| Has tests | No | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? nickemanarin/screentogif · qianmo/unity-design-pattern
Ask AI about nickemanarin/screentogif vs qianmo/unity-design-pattern
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.