phaserjs/phaser vs unbug/codelf
phaserjs/phaser shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, phaser shows healthier maintenance signals than codelf. phaser rates Healthy overall while codelf rates Mixed. phaser was committed to 3 days ago with 7+ active contributors, while codelf last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor. phaser is MIT-licensed while codelf is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
phaserjs/phaser →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
unbug/codelf →
Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
non-standard license (Other); single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 11mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 11mo ago
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| phaser | codelf | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 39,846 | 14,177 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 114 | 43 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 5% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? phaserjs/phaser · unbug/codelf
Ask AI about phaserjs/phaser vs unbug/codelf
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.