phaserjs/phaser vs vercel/pkg
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
phaserjs/phaser →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
Show 4 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
vercel/pkg →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| phaser | pkg | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 39,624 | 24,379 |
| Last commit | 15d ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 103 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 5% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? phaserjs/phaser · vercel/pkg
Ask AI about phaserjs/phaser vs vercel/pkg
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.