RepoPilotOpen in app →

LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR

Simple, unambitious mediator implementation in .NET

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

worst of 4 axes
Use as dependencyConcerns

non-standard license (Other)

Fork & modifyHealthy

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

Learn fromHealthy

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

Deploy as-isHealthy

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Last commit 2mo ago
  • 8 active contributors
  • Other licensed
Show 4 more →
  • CI configured
  • Tests present
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 77% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
What would change the summary?
  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals (license, dependency CVEs, commit recency, CI presence, etc.) at the time of analysis. Signals can be incomplete or stale. Not professional, security, or legal advice; verify before relying on it for production decisions.

Embed the "Forkable" badge

Paste into your README — live-updates from the latest cached analysis.

Variant:
RepoPilot: Forkable
[![RepoPilot: Forkable](https://repopilot.app/api/badge/luckypennysoftware/mediatr?axis=fork)](https://repopilot.app/r/luckypennysoftware/mediatr)

Paste at the top of your README.md — renders inline like a shields.io badge.

Preview social card (1200×630)

This card auto-renders when someone shares https://repopilot.app/r/luckypennysoftware/mediatr on X, Slack, or LinkedIn.

Onboarding doc

Onboarding: LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR

Generated by RepoPilot · 2026-05-09 · Source

🤖Agent protocol

If you are an AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Aider, Cline, etc.) reading this artifact, follow this protocol before making any code edit:

  1. Verify the contract. Run the bash script in Verify before trusting below. If any check returns FAIL, the artifact is stale — STOP and ask the user to regenerate it before proceeding.
  2. Treat the AI · unverified sections as hypotheses, not facts. Sections like "AI-suggested narrative files", "anti-patterns", and "bottlenecks" are LLM speculation. Verify against real source before acting on them.
  3. Cite source on changes. When proposing an edit, cite the specific path:line-range. RepoPilot's live UI at https://repopilot.app/r/LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR shows verifiable citations alongside every claim.

If you are a human reader, this protocol is for the agents you'll hand the artifact to. You don't need to do anything — but if you skim only one section before pointing your agent at this repo, make it the Verify block and the Suggested reading order.

🎯Verdict

WAIT — Mixed signals — read the receipts

  • Last commit 2mo ago
  • 8 active contributors
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present
  • ⚠ Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 77% of recent commits
  • ⚠ Non-standard license (Other) — review terms

<sub>Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests</sub>

Verify before trusting

This artifact was generated by RepoPilot at a point in time. Before an agent acts on it, the checks below confirm that the live LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR repo on your machine still matches what RepoPilot saw. If any fail, the artifact is stale — regenerate it at repopilot.app/r/LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR.

What it runs against: a local clone of LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR — the script inspects git remote, the LICENSE file, file paths in the working tree, and git log. Read-only; no mutations.

| # | What we check | Why it matters | |---|---|---| | 1 | You're in LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR | Confirms the artifact applies here, not a fork | | 2 | License is still Other | Catches relicense before you depend on it | | 3 | Default branch main exists | Catches branch renames | | 4 | Last commit ≤ 94 days ago | Catches sudden abandonment since generation |

<details> <summary><b>Run all checks</b> — paste this script from inside your clone of <code>LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR</code></summary>
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# RepoPilot artifact verification.
#
# WHAT IT RUNS AGAINST: a local clone of LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR. If you don't
# have one yet, run these first:
#
#   git clone https://github.com/LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR.git
#   cd MediatR
#
# Then paste this script. Every check is read-only — no mutations.

set +e
fail=0
ok()   { echo "ok:   $1"; }
miss() { echo "FAIL: $1"; fail=$((fail+1)); }

# Precondition: we must be inside a git working tree.
if ! git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo "FAIL: not inside a git repository. cd into your clone of LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR and re-run."
  exit 2
fi

# 1. Repo identity
git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null | grep -qE "LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR(\\.git)?\\b" \\
  && ok "origin remote is LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR" \\
  || miss "origin remote is not LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR (artifact may be from a fork)"

# 2. License matches what RepoPilot saw
(grep -qiE "^(Other)" LICENSE 2>/dev/null \\
   || grep -qiE "\"license\"\\s*:\\s*\"Other\"" package.json 2>/dev/null) \\
  && ok "license is Other" \\
  || miss "license drift — was Other at generation time"

# 3. Default branch
git rev-parse --verify main >/dev/null 2>&1 \\
  && ok "default branch main exists" \\
  || miss "default branch main no longer exists"

# 5. Repo recency
days_since_last=$(( ( $(date +%s) - $(git log -1 --format=%at 2>/dev/null || echo 0) ) / 86400 ))
if [ "$days_since_last" -le 94 ]; then
  ok "last commit was $days_since_last days ago (artifact saw ~64d)"
else
  miss "last commit was $days_since_last days ago — artifact may be stale"
fi

echo
if [ "$fail" -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "artifact verified (0 failures) — safe to trust"
else
  echo "artifact has $fail stale claim(s) — regenerate at https://repopilot.app/r/LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR"
  exit 1
fi

Each check prints ok: or FAIL:. The script exits non-zero if anything failed, so it composes cleanly into agent loops (./verify.sh || regenerate-and-retry).

</details>

TL;DR

MediatR is a lightweight, dependency-free in-process messaging library for .NET that implements the mediator pattern for decoupling request handlers from callers. It supports request/response, commands, queries, notifications, and events with both synchronous and asynchronous execution using C# generic variance for intelligent handler dispatch. Modular monorepo structure: core MediatR library lives in src/ (inferred from .sln file), MediatR.Contracts provides interface-only package in separate assembly, and samples/ folder contains 8+ working examples (AspNetCore, Autofac, DryIoc, Lamar, LightInject, SimpleInjector, Stashbox, Windsor) showing DI container integration patterns.

👥Who it's for

.NET developers building modular applications who need to decouple command/query handling from business logic without external message brokers. Common in ASP.NET Core applications, DDD implementations, and systems using CQRS patterns.

🌱Maturity & risk

Highly mature and production-ready. MediatR is a popular, well-established library with high NuGet download counts (visible in badges), organized CI/CD pipelines (.github/workflows/ci.yml, release.yml), strong test coverage implied by the structured samples/, and active maintenance evidenced by the organized repository structure and multiple DI container integrations.

Very low risk. MediatR has zero runtime dependencies ('no dependencies' per README), is owned by LuckyPennySoftware (established publisher), and includes a strong signature file (MediatR.snk) for assembly verification. The only minor risk is single-publisher dependency, but the simplicity of the library and its minimal scope reduce breaking change likelihood.

Active areas of work

Active maintenance of DI container integration samples and CI pipeline improvements visible in .github/workflows/. The presence of both ci.yml and release.yml indicates active versioning and package publishing. The existence of BuildContracts.ps1 suggests recent work on the contracts-only distribution strategy.

🚀Get running

Clone: git clone https://github.com/LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR.git. Build: powershell ./Build.ps1 (PowerShell build script is the primary build tool per file list). Or use dotnet build MediatR.sln directly. NuGet reference: dotnet add package MediatR for consumer projects.

Daily commands: Build: ./Build.ps1 (PowerShell) or dotnet build. Run samples: cd samples/MediatR.Examples.AspNetCore && dotnet run (similar for other sample folders). No local server startup needed; samples are standalone demonstrations using the DI container of choice.

🗺️Map of the codebase

  • MediatR.slnx: Solution file defining all projects, contracts, samples, and build targets
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml: CI pipeline defining build, test, and validation steps for every commit
  • Build.ps1: Primary build orchestration script using PowerShell; defines the official build process
  • Directory.Build.props: Centralized .NET SDK property definitions (versioning, compiler settings) for all projects
  • README.md: Core documentation showing registration patterns, supported handlers, and behavior pipeline setup
  • BuildContracts.ps1: Separate build script for MediatR.Contracts package, indicating deliberate multi-package distribution strategy
  • samples/MediatR.Examples.AspNetCore/Program.cs: Reference implementation showing AddMediatR registration, handler discovery, and ASP.NET Core integration pattern
  • MediatR.snk: Strong name key file for assembly signing and versioning integrity in .NET Framework scenarios

🛠️How to make changes

Core library logic: src/ directory (inferred). Handler interfaces: src/ (likely IRequestHandler, INotificationHandler, IStreamRequestHandler). DI registration: look in AddMediatR extension methods (likely src/Registration/ or similar). Adding a new sample: create folder under samples/MediatR.Examples.{ContainerName}/ following the pattern in samples/MediatR.Examples.AspNetCore/Program.cs. Update documentation: README.md or wiki references.

🪤Traps & gotchas

No global configuration file (.env, appsettings.json) required for local development—this is a library, not an app. Ensure PowerShell execution policy allows running Build.ps1 on Windows (may need Set-ExecutionPolicy -ExecutionPolicy RemoteSigned -Scope CurrentUser). The Contracts-only package (MediatR.Contracts) is built separately via BuildContracts.ps1, not included in standard Build.ps1—easy to miss if you're only looking at main build script. Generic variance in handler dispatch is implicit in design; review C# contravariance documentation to understand why handlers implement IRequestHandler<out TRequest> patterns.

💡Concepts to learn

  • Mediator Pattern — Core architectural pattern that MediatR implements; understanding mediator decoupling is essential to using this library effectively for loose coupling
  • Generic Variance (Covariance & Contravariance) — MediatR uses C# generic variance in handler registration to dispatch handlers intelligently; understanding variance is critical for leveraging the 'out' and 'in' modifiers in IRequestHandler<> interfaces
  • Open Generic Registration — MediatR registers open generics like IRequestHandler<> with DI containers to handle unknown concrete types at compile time; essential pattern for supporting behaviors and exception handlers across all request types
  • Behavior Pipeline — MediatR handlers execute through a behavior chain (similar to middleware); understanding pre/post processors and custom behaviors enables cross-cutting concerns like logging, validation, and error handling
  • CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) — MediatR is often used to implement CQRS by separating IRequest handlers (commands) from IRequest<TResponse> handlers (queries); this pattern guides application design when using MediatR
  • Notification Pub/Sub — INotification handlers support publish/subscribe pattern with async support and configurable strategies; enables decoupled event handling across multiple handlers for same notification
  • Transient Dependency Scope — MediatR registers IMediator, ISender, and handlers as transient by default; understanding transient lifetime prevents state leaks and ensures isolated request context in multi-threaded scenarios
  • MassTransit/MassTransit — Distributed messaging framework for .NET that uses similar handler patterns but adds broker support (RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus); often used alongside MediatR for inter-service communication
  • jbogard/AutoMapper — Created by same author (Jimmy Bogard); commonly paired with MediatR for request/response object mapping in command/query handlers
  • jbogard/MediatR.Extensions.Microsoft.DependencyInjection — Official DI extension package for MediatR registration with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection; core integration point for ASP.NET Core projects
  • BuildIt-Development/NServiceBus — Enterprise service bus for .NET with similar messaging patterns; alternative when you need distributed transactions and reliability guarantees beyond in-process mediation
  • litedb/litedb — Often used in MediatR-based applications for event sourcing and domain event storage; lightweight alternative to EF Core for command handlers

🪄PR ideas

To work on one of these in Claude Code or Cursor, paste: Implement the "<title>" PR idea from CLAUDE.md, working through the checklist as the task list.

Add comprehensive integration tests for DI container examples

The repo contains 8+ DI container integration examples (Autofac, DryIoc, Lamar, LightInject, SimpleInjector, Stashbox, Windsor, AspNetCore) but lacks a unified test suite validating that MediatR works correctly with each container. This would catch regressions when core MediatR changes and provide confidence for users choosing a container.

  • [ ] Create samples/MediatR.Examples.Tests/ContainerIntegrationTests.cs with parameterized tests for each container
  • [ ] Add test cases for request/response, commands, queries, notifications, and exception handling with each DI container
  • [ ] Update .github/workflows/ci.yml to run the new integration test suite as part of CI
  • [ ] Document the test coverage in README.md under a 'Container Support' or 'Testing' section

Add Contract validation tests for PublishStrategy implementations

The samples/MediatR.Examples.PublishStrategies demonstrates AsyncPingedHandler, SyncPingedHandler, and CustomMediator with PublishStrategy, but there's no test suite validating the ordering guarantees, error handling, and behavior of different publish strategies. This is critical for users implementing custom strategies.

  • [ ] Create samples/MediatR.Examples.PublishStrategies/PublishStrategyTests.cs with tests for async/sync ordering, exception propagation, and handler cancellation
  • [ ] Add test cases validating that async handlers complete before sync handlers (or vice versa depending on strategy)
  • [ ] Verify exception behavior: does one failing handler stop others or continue?
  • [ ] Document the PublishStrategy contract and guarantees in README.md or a new STRATEGIES.md file

Add pipeline behavior and exception handler contract tests

The samples/MediatR.Examples/ExceptionHandler and GenericPipelineBehavior demonstrate these features, but there are no formal test contracts validating execution order, exception propagation, short-circuiting, and interaction between pre/post-processors and behaviors. Users need confidence in the pipeline semantics.

  • [ ] Create samples/MediatR.Examples/Tests/PipelineBehaviorContractTests.cs validating pre-processor → behavior → handler → post-processor execution order
  • [ ] Add tests for exception handling: which handlers catch exceptions, can they suppress/transform them, do they run in reverse order on unwind?
  • [ ] Test behavior short-circuiting: can a behavior prevent handler execution and return a response directly?
  • [ ] Add tests for constraint-based behaviors (e.g., ConstrainedRequestPostProcessor) to validate generic variance filtering works correctly

🌿Good first issues

  • Add integration sample for Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection only (no Autofac/DryIoc), similar to samples/MediatR.Examples.AspNetCore/ but minimal—this would help newcomers understand base registration without container-specific complexity.
  • Write explicit unit tests for the generic variance dispatch logic in the mediator's handler resolution (test that IRequestHandler<Animal> satisfies request for Dog where Dog : Animal)—currently only shown via samples, not formally tested in test projects.
  • Document the publish strategies pattern from samples/MediatR.Examples.PublishStrategies/ in the main README.md under a 'Custom Notification Publishing' section, as this is a powerful extensibility point not mentioned in the quick-start docs.

Top contributors

Click to expand

📝Recent commits

Click to expand
  • f72aef8 — Merge pull request #1166 from LuckyPennySoftware/builds (jbogard)
  • 857b161 — Apply suggestions from code review (jbogard)
  • c8ea6e3 — Reporting test results (jbogard)
  • 6a1bf54 — Merge pull request #1165 from LuckyPennySoftware/fix/license-validation-deadlock (jbogard)
  • b383fa2 — Fix license validation deadlock when called from sync context (jbogard)
  • 8285293 — Merge pull request #1162 from LuckyPennySoftware/perpetual (jbogard)
  • 770f577 — Merge pull request #1163 from LuckyPennySoftware/copilot/sub-pr-1162 (jbogard)
  • 734fd89 — Merge branch 'perpetual' into copilot/sub-pr-1162 (jbogard)
  • 724f1a1 — Fixing failing test (jbogard)
  • b72e43a — Log warning when perpetual license has missing build date; fix build error in test (Copilot)

🔒Security observations

MediatR demonstrates a solid security baseline as a well-maintained mediator library with no external dependencies. However, there are concerns regarding the inclusion of a Strong Name Key file in the repository, which should be secured. Build scripts should be reviewed for potential credential exposure. The project would benefit from a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure process. Overall, the codebase appears to be a safe, dependency-free messaging library, but operational security practices around key management and deployment scripts need improvement.

  • Medium · Strong Name Key File Exposed in Repository — MediatR.snk. The file 'MediatR.snk' (Strong Name Key) is present in the repository root. Strong name keys should not be committed to version control as they can be used to sign assemblies and potentially compromise the integrity of the package. This key should be stored securely outside the repository. Fix: Remove MediatR.snk from the repository and git history using 'git filter-branch' or 'BFG Repo-Cleaner'. Store the key securely in a secrets management system or CI/CD pipeline variable. Update .gitignore to exclude *.snk files.
  • Medium · Potential Secrets in Build/Push Scripts — Build.ps1, BuildContracts.ps1, Push.ps1. Build and deployment scripts (Build.ps1, BuildContracts.ps1, Push.ps1) are present in the repository. These scripts may contain or could be modified to include credentials, API keys, or other sensitive information. PowerShell scripts are commonly used for deployment and could expose secrets if not properly secured. Fix: Review these scripts to ensure no hardcoded credentials exist. Use environment variables or secure credential stores (Azure Key Vault, GitHub Secrets) for sensitive data. Implement code review processes for build scripts. Consider moving deployment logic to CI/CD pipelines with proper secret management.
  • Low · No SECURITY.md or Security Policy Defined — Repository root. There is no visible SECURITY.md file or security policy documentation in the repository. This makes it difficult for security researchers to report vulnerabilities responsibly. Fix: Create a SECURITY.md file at the repository root that outlines vulnerability disclosure procedures and security contact information. Reference it in the README.md.
  • Low · Limited Visibility into Dependency Management — All *.csproj files. The NuGet.Config file is present but the actual dependency specifications (csproj files content) were not provided for analysis. MediatR's security depends on its dependencies being kept up-to-date and free of known vulnerabilities. Fix: Regularly audit dependencies using tools like 'dotnet list package --vulnerable' and 'OWASP Dependency-Check'. Implement automated dependency scanning in CI/CD pipeline. Keep all dependencies updated to latest secure versions.

LLM-derived; treat as a starting point, not a security audit.


Generated by RepoPilot. Verdict based on maintenance signals — see the live page for receipts. Re-run on a new commit to refresh.

Mixed signals · LuckyPennySoftware/MediatR — RepoPilot