foundation/foundation-sites · Security & risks
Authoritative risk signals for foundation/foundation-sites — dependency CVEs (deps.dev), OpenSSF Scorecard, and GitHub Code Scanning. Not a substitute for your own security review.
Dependency CVEs (deps.dev)
0
Critical
0 direct
0
High
0 direct
2
Moderate
25
Deps scanned
25 direct
- GHSA-6vr3-7wcx-v5g5 · browserstack-runner (direct)browserstack-runner vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via vm sandbox escape in _log HTTP handlerMODERATE
- GHSA-8rpw-6cqh-2v9h · browserstack-runner (direct)browserstack-runner has an unauthenticated arbitrary file read via path traversal in HTTP serverMODERATE
OpenSSF Scorecard · 3.6/10
- Packaging—
- Signed-Releases—
- Branch-Protection—
- Maintained0/10
- Token-Permissions0/10
- CII-Best-Practices0/10
- Pinned-Dependencies0/10
- Fuzzing0/10
Ask AI about foundation/foundation-sites
Grounded in the actual source code. Pick a starter question or write your own.
What does this repo do, in one paragraph?How would I get started using it?What are the main alternatives?Show me the entry point.
Or write your own questionInformational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis; they can be incomplete or stale. Not professional, security, or legal advice.