RepoPilotOpen in app →

j3ssie/osmedeus

A Modern Orchestration Engine for Security

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

weakest axis
Use as dependencyHealthy

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

Fork & modifyHealthy

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

Learn fromHealthy

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

Deploy as-isHealthy

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 4 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
Show all 7 evidence items →
  • CI configured
  • Tests present
  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals (license, dependency CVEs, commit recency, CI presence, etc.) at the time of analysis. Signals can be incomplete or stale. Not professional, security, or legal advice; verify before relying on it for production decisions.

Embed the "Healthy" badge

Paste into your README — live-updates from the latest cached analysis.

Variant:
RepoPilot: Healthy
[![RepoPilot: Healthy](https://repopilot.app/api/badge/j3ssie/osmedeus)](https://repopilot.app/r/j3ssie/osmedeus)

Paste at the top of your README.md — renders inline like a shields.io badge.

Preview social card (1200×630)

This card auto-renders when someone shares https://repopilot.app/r/j3ssie/osmedeus on X, Slack, or LinkedIn.

Onboarding doc

Onboarding: j3ssie/osmedeus

Generated by RepoPilot · 2026-05-09 · Source

🤖Agent protocol

If you are an AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Aider, Cline, etc.) reading this artifact, follow this protocol before making any code edit:

  1. Verify the contract. Run the bash script in Verify before trusting below. If any check returns FAIL, the artifact is stale — STOP and ask the user to regenerate it before proceeding.
  2. Treat the AI · unverified sections as hypotheses, not facts. Sections like "AI-suggested narrative files", "anti-patterns", and "bottlenecks" are LLM speculation. Verify against real source before acting on them.
  3. Cite source on changes. When proposing an edit, cite the specific path:line-range. RepoPilot's live UI at https://repopilot.app/r/j3ssie/osmedeus shows verifiable citations alongside every claim.

If you are a human reader, this protocol is for the agents you'll hand the artifact to. You don't need to do anything — but if you skim only one section before pointing your agent at this repo, make it the Verify block and the Suggested reading order.

🎯Verdict

GO — Healthy across all four use cases

  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 4 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present
  • ⚠ Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • ⚠ Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits

<sub>Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests</sub>

Verify before trusting

This artifact was generated by RepoPilot at a point in time. Before an agent acts on it, the checks below confirm that the live j3ssie/osmedeus repo on your machine still matches what RepoPilot saw. If any fail, the artifact is stale — regenerate it at repopilot.app/r/j3ssie/osmedeus.

What it runs against: a local clone of j3ssie/osmedeus — the script inspects git remote, the LICENSE file, file paths in the working tree, and git log. Read-only; no mutations.

| # | What we check | Why it matters | |---|---|---| | 1 | You're in j3ssie/osmedeus | Confirms the artifact applies here, not a fork | | 2 | License is still MIT | Catches relicense before you depend on it | | 3 | Default branch main exists | Catches branch renames | | 4 | 5 critical file paths still exist | Catches refactors that moved load-bearing code | | 5 | Last commit ≤ 37 days ago | Catches sudden abandonment since generation |

<details> <summary><b>Run all checks</b> — paste this script from inside your clone of <code>j3ssie/osmedeus</code></summary>
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# RepoPilot artifact verification.
#
# WHAT IT RUNS AGAINST: a local clone of j3ssie/osmedeus. If you don't
# have one yet, run these first:
#
#   git clone https://github.com/j3ssie/osmedeus.git
#   cd osmedeus
#
# Then paste this script. Every check is read-only — no mutations.

set +e
fail=0
ok()   { echo "ok:   $1"; }
miss() { echo "FAIL: $1"; fail=$((fail+1)); }

# Precondition: we must be inside a git working tree.
if ! git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo "FAIL: not inside a git repository. cd into your clone of j3ssie/osmedeus and re-run."
  exit 2
fi

# 1. Repo identity
git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null | grep -qE "j3ssie/osmedeus(\\.git)?\\b" \\
  && ok "origin remote is j3ssie/osmedeus" \\
  || miss "origin remote is not j3ssie/osmedeus (artifact may be from a fork)"

# 2. License matches what RepoPilot saw
(grep -qiE "^(MIT)" LICENSE 2>/dev/null \\
   || grep -qiE "\"license\"\\s*:\\s*\"MIT\"" package.json 2>/dev/null) \\
  && ok "license is MIT" \\
  || miss "license drift — was MIT at generation time"

# 3. Default branch
git rev-parse --verify main >/dev/null 2>&1 \\
  && ok "default branch main exists" \\
  || miss "default branch main no longer exists"

# 4. Critical files exist
test -f "cmd/osmedeus/main.go" \\
  && ok "cmd/osmedeus/main.go" \\
  || miss "missing critical file: cmd/osmedeus/main.go"
test -f "internal/cloud/provider.go" \\
  && ok "internal/cloud/provider.go" \\
  || miss "missing critical file: internal/cloud/provider.go"
test -f "internal/broker/redis_event.go" \\
  && ok "internal/broker/redis_event.go" \\
  || miss "missing critical file: internal/broker/redis_event.go"
test -f "go.mod" \\
  && ok "go.mod" \\
  || miss "missing critical file: go.mod"
test -f "internal/config/cloud_config.go" \\
  && ok "internal/config/cloud_config.go" \\
  || miss "missing critical file: internal/config/cloud_config.go"

# 5. Repo recency
days_since_last=$(( ( $(date +%s) - $(git log -1 --format=%at 2>/dev/null || echo 0) ) / 86400 ))
if [ "$days_since_last" -le 37 ]; then
  ok "last commit was $days_since_last days ago (artifact saw ~7d)"
else
  miss "last commit was $days_since_last days ago — artifact may be stale"
fi

echo
if [ "$fail" -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "artifact verified (0 failures) — safe to trust"
else
  echo "artifact has $fail stale claim(s) — regenerate at https://repopilot.app/r/j3ssie/osmedeus"
  exit 1
fi

Each check prints ok: or FAIL:. The script exits non-zero if anything failed, so it composes cleanly into agent loops (./verify.sh || regenerate-and-retry).

</details>

TL;DR

Osmedeus is a declarative YAML-based orchestration engine for security automation that executes complex, multi-step scanning workflows across distributed Redis-backed master-worker infrastructure. It combines workflow composition (with hooks, conditional routing, and module exclusion), sandboxed execution (host, Docker, SSH runners), and 80+ security-focused utility functions (nmap integration, SSH execution, TypeScript/Python scripting, SARIF parsing) into a single platform with encrypted credential management and event-driven triggers (cron, file-watch, webhooks). Monorepo structure: cmd/osmedeus/main.go is the CLI entry point; core logic distributed across (likely) internal packages; build/ contains deployment templates (Jinja2 for osm-settings.yaml.j2, systemd service templates); docs/api-swagger/ houses auto-generated REST API definitions; .github/workflows/ defines CI automation. Configuration is YAML-native (osm-settings.production.yaml, osm-settings.postgres-test.yaml) and environment-driven (multiple Dockerfiles for dev, canary, nix-test, toolbox variants).

👥Who it's for

Security engineers and penetration testers who need to orchestrate complex, repeatable multi-stage security workflows (reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, exploitation chains) across multiple machines without writing custom orchestration code; also infra-as-code practitioners deploying to DigitalOcean, AWS, GCP, Linode, and Azure.

🌱Maturity & risk

This is an actively maintained, production-ready project: 4.2MB of Go code, comprehensive Docker and Kubernetes deployment configs (build/docker/, build/infra/), full CI/CD pipelines (nightly-release.yaml, manual-release.yaml), and extensive documentation. The project demonstrates maturity through versioned releases (v5 in go.mod), established patterns for multi-environment testing (postgres-test, nix-test, distributed-e2e compose files), and a stable REST API with Swagger docs.

Primary risk is dependency surface: 50+ third-party Go libraries including cloud SDKs (AWS, DigitalOcean, Pulumi, Azure), JavaScript/TypeScript runtime (goja), and cryptography modules increase attack surface and maintenance burden. Secondary risk: single primary maintainer (j3ssie) pattern visible in repo ownership. No obvious abandoned status, but contribution pattern (if any) should be verified in GitHub metrics. Breaking changes between v4→v5 (per go.mod) suggest potential backwards-incompatibility concerns for existing workflows.

Active areas of work

Active development in release automation (.github/workflows/nightly-release.yaml and manual-release.yaml suggest regular releases), distributed system expansion (docker-compose.distributed-e2e.yaml, docker-compose.distributed-test.yaml show recent investment in multi-node testing), and polyglot support (Jinja templating, Nix expressions, Makefile-driven builds suggest tooling infrastructure work). API and SDK maturity (docs/api/README.mdx, Swagger generation) indicates ongoing REST/web UI refinement.

🚀Get running

git clone https://github.com/j3ssie/osmedeus.git
cd osmedeus
make build  # or 'make dev' for development setup
./cmd/osmedeus/osmedeus -h  # verify build

Alternatively, use Docker: docker build -f build/docker/Dockerfile -t osmedeus . && docker run osmedeus. Check Makefile for full target list and build/DEPLOYMENT.md for multi-node setups.

Daily commands: Development: make dev or make build (check Makefile for exact targets). Production Docker: docker-compose -f build/docker/docker-compose.production.yaml up. Distributed cluster: docker-compose -f build/docker/docker-compose.distributed-e2e.yaml up. Requires environment setup (see build/docker/.env.example for secrets: API keys, database URLs, Redis endpoints). For local testing with PostgreSQL: docker-compose -f build/docker/docker-compose.postgres-test.yaml up.

🗺️Map of the codebase

  • cmd/osmedeus/main.go — Entry point for the Osmedeus orchestration engine; all developers must understand the bootstrap and CLI initialization logic
  • internal/cloud/provider.go — Core abstraction for multi-cloud provider support (AWS, GCP, Azure, etc.); essential for understanding distributed execution
  • internal/broker/redis_event.go — Event messaging backbone using Redis; critical for inter-component communication and workflow orchestration
  • go.mod — Declares all dependencies including AWS SDK v2, Charmbracelet TUI, Pulumi, and Docker SDK; foundational for build and runtime
  • internal/config/cloud_config.go — Configuration schema for cloud deployments; required reading for understanding how Osmedeus provisions and manages infrastructure
  • internal/client/client.go — HTTP client for API communication; defines request/response patterns used throughout the codebase
  • build/docker/docker-compose.yml — Reference compose configuration for local and distributed deployments; shows expected service topology and networking

🛠️How to make changes

Add Support for a New Cloud Provider

  1. Create a new provider file in internal/cloud/ (e.g., internal/cloud/scaleway.go) implementing the Provider interface defined in internal/cloud/provider.go (internal/cloud/provider.go)
  2. Implement required methods: Create(), Destroy(), List(), GetSSHKey(), and health check logic (internal/cloud/scaleway.go)
  3. Register the new provider in the factory function in internal/cloud/registry.go (internal/cloud/registry.go)
  4. Add provider-specific configuration fields to internal/config/cloud_config.go (internal/config/cloud_config.go)
  5. Add example docker-compose and settings files in build/docker/ for testing the new provider (build/docker/docker-compose.yml)

Add a New Workflow Type or Task

  1. Define the workflow schema and configuration in internal/config/ (extend cloud_config.go or create workflow_config.go) (internal/config/cloud_config.go)
  2. Implement task execution logic that emits events via the Redis broker (internal/broker/redis_event.go)
  3. Register the new task type in the task registry (check internal/cloud/registry.go pattern) (internal/cloud/registry.go)
  4. Add CLI command in cmd/osmedeus/main.go to trigger the new workflow (cmd/osmedeus/main.go)

Modify Cloud Infrastructure Provisioning

  1. Update Pulumi infrastructure definition in internal/cloud/pulumi.go or internal/cloud/pulumi_writer.go (internal/cloud/pulumi.go)
  2. Update cloud-init templates in internal/cloud/cloudinit.go for instance initialization (internal/cloud/cloudinit.go)
  3. Adjust provider-specific lifecycle code (e.g., internal/cloud/aws.go for AWS-specific tags, security groups) (internal/cloud/aws.go)
  4. Update docker-compose files and deployment templates to reflect infrastructure changes (build/docker/docker-compose.production.yaml)

Add Event Logging or Monitoring

  1. Extend event schema and publish logic in internal/broker/redis_event.go (internal/broker/redis_event.go)
  2. Emit new event types when tasks complete, fail, or reach milestones (internal/cloud/lifecycle.go)
  3. Subscribe to events in internal/broker/redis_event.go for aggregation or forwarding (internal/broker/redis_event.go)

🔧Why these technologies

  • Go 1.26+ — Compiles to stateless binary; enables cross-platform deployment (Linux, macOS, Windows); strong concurrency primitives for distributed orchestration
  • Redis — Provides high-throughput event broker for asynchronous task coordination and real-time event streaming across distributed workers
  • Multi-cloud SDKs (AWS SDK v2, GCP client, etc.) — Native provider APIs eliminate vendor lock-in; allows runtime selection of infrastructure provider based on configuration
  • Pulumi — Infrastructure-as-Code framework for multi-cloud provisioning; enables reproducible infrastructure definitions and version control
  • Docker & docker-compose — Standardizes deployment across dev, test, and production environments; enables containerized agent deployment on remote instances
  • Charmbracelet TUI libraries (bubbletea, lipgloss, glamour) — Provides rich terminal UI for interactive workflows and real-time status monitoring without external dependencies

⚖️Trade-offs already made

  • Abstract provider interface vs. single-cloud implementation

    • Why: Supports multiple cloud backends (AWS, GCP, Azure, etc.) with minimal code duplication
    • Consequence: Adds initial development overhead; requires careful interface design to capture provider commonalities; some provider-specific features may not map cleanly to the abstraction
  • Synchronous HTTP client + Redis async broker

    • Why: HTTP client handles request/response patterns; Redis handles fire-and-forget event notifications for scalability
    • Consequence: Mixed synchronous and asynchronous patterns require careful error handling and retry logic; developers must understand when to use each approach
  • Pulumi for IaC vs. hand-crafted SDK calls

    • Why: Pulumi abstracts infrastructure differences and provides versioning; SDK calls give direct control for complex provisioning
    • Consequence: Dual path adds maintenance burden; Pulumi must be kept in sync with direct SDK usage in provider files
  • CLI-first interface with optional REST API

    • Why: CLI enables scriptable automation; REST API supports programmatic access and web UIs
    • Consequence: Two entry points must be maintained; feature parity between CLI and API is critical but easy to miss

🚫Non-goals (don't propose these)

  • This is not a general-purpose container orchestration platform; it is specifically for security tooling orchestration and vulnerability scanning workflows
  • Does not provide built-in authentication/authorization; relies on external identity providers or reverse proxies (implied by 'distributed' architecture docs)
  • Not a real-time streaming analytics engine; event broker (Redis) is for coordination, not for complex event processing
  • Does not handle persistent storage of artifacts; focuses on orchestration, with storage assumed to be external (S3, GCS, etc.)
  • Not Windows-native; assumes Linux/Unix-compatible systems for remote workers and cloud instances

🪤Traps & gotchas

Redis requirement: Distributed mode (docker-compose.distributed-*.yaml files) mandates Redis for queue/state sync; local development may skip this but production deployments cannot. PostgreSQL vs SQLite: Default is SQLite (mattn/go-sqlite3), but production (docker-compose.production.yaml) uses PostgreSQL; schema/migrations must match. LLM API keys: agentic steps require OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, or GOOGLE_GENAI_API_KEY in environment; missing keys cause silent failures. Docker-in-Docker: Docker runner execution likely requires /var/run/docker.sock mounting; SSH runners need pre-configured SSH keys (see build/docker/ssh-test/id_ed25519). Workflow YAML parsing: Uses pongo2 templating + gojq; variable name conflicts or malformed YAML silently fail; validate with lint before deploy. Version pinning: go.mod shows v5 major version; v4 workflows may not be compatible.

🏗️Architecture

💡Concepts to learn

  • Master-Worker Job Queue (Redis) — Osmedeus distributes workflow execution across workers via Redis; understanding pub/sub, task serialization, and fault recovery is critical for scaling beyond single-machine deployments.
  • Declarative YAML Templating (Pongo2 + Jinja2) — Workflows are defined in YAML with variable substitution and conditionals (pongo2); contributors must understand template rendering to add new workflow features or debug template failures.
  • Sandboxed Execution Contexts (Host/Docker/SSH) — Osmedeus isolates workflow steps in different execution environments; understanding runner selection, privileged escalation, and output capture is essential for security and debugging.
  • Agentic LLM Loops with Tool Calling — Osmedeus embeds Claude/Gemini agents that iteratively call security tools (sub-agent pattern); contributors adding new LLM capabilities must understand structured output, memory management, and agent termination conditions.
  • Event-Driven Scheduling (Cron + File-Watch + Webhooks) — Workflows trigger on time-based, file-system, or external events with deduplication and delayed queues; understanding trigger chains and backpressure is needed for robust automation.
  • Infrastructure-as-Code Provisioning (Pulumi) — Osmedeus can programmatically spin up cloud VMs (DigitalOcean, AWS, GCP, Azure) via Pulumi; contributors modifying cloud support must understand IaC state management and cross-cloud abstractions.
  • JQ-Style JSON Path Querying (gojq) — Workflows extract and transform structured data from tool outputs using JQ expressions (itchyny/gojq); understanding filter composition and array slicing is needed to build reliable data pipelines.
  • aquasecurity/trivy — Complementary security scanner (vulnerability detection) often orchestrated via Osmedeus workflows; represents the scanning payload tier.
  • nmap/nmap — Referenced in Osmedeus feature set (nmap integration in function library); common reconnaissance target executed by Osmedeus runners.
  • gremlin/gremlin-go — Chaos engineering orchestration; shares similar distributed execution and event-driven scheduling patterns for different use case (reliability testing vs security scanning).
  • hashicorp/terraform — Infrastructure-as-Code precedent; Osmedeus build/infra uses Pulumi (Terraform alternative) for cloud provisioning, suggesting similar declarative approach.
  • elastic/beats — Distributed agent collection framework; Osmedeus master-worker pattern (Redis + distributed runners) parallels Beats' central collection and sidecar architecture.

🪄PR ideas

To work on one of these in Claude Code or Cursor, paste: Implement the "<title>" PR idea from CLAUDE.md, working through the checklist as the task list.

Add comprehensive integration tests for Docker Compose configurations

The repo has 7+ docker-compose files (production, test, distributed, postgres-test, etc.) but no visible test suite validating these configurations work correctly. A new contributor could create a GitHub Actions workflow that validates syntax, builds images, and runs basic health checks across different compose scenarios. This prevents configuration drift and deployment failures.

  • [ ] Create .github/workflows/docker-compose-validate.yaml to lint all build/docker/docker-compose*.yaml files using docker-compose config
  • [ ] Add integration test steps that build docker images from build/docker/Dockerfile* variants
  • [ ] Create test matrix for different compose scenarios (production, postgres-test, distributed-test) to verify service health checks pass
  • [ ] Document in build/DEPLOYMENT.md which compose file to use for different deployment scenarios

Add API endpoint documentation for missing features in docs/api/

The docs/api/ directory has reference docs, but the file structure and swagger definitions (docs/api-swagger/) suggest undocumented endpoints. The LLM integration (llm.mdx exists) and event-receiver endpoints lack concrete examples. A contributor could audit the swagger.yaml against actual implementations and fill gaps with request/response examples.

  • [ ] Parse docs/api-swagger/openapi.yaml and compare endpoints against docs/api/*.mdx files
  • [ ] Expand docs/api/event-receiver.mdx with webhook payload examples and retry logic documentation
  • [ ] Expand docs/api/llm.mdx with supported models, streaming response handling, and error codes
  • [ ] Add docs/api/distributed.mdx with examples of multi-node orchestration and node communication protocols

Implement GitHub Actions workflow for Go dependency security audits and compatibility checks

The project has go 1.26.0 and complex dependencies (pulumi, aws-sdk, gocron) but no visible supply-chain security workflow. A new contributor could add CI that runs nancy/gosec checks and validates go.mod/go.sum integrity on PRs, reducing vulnerability exposure.

  • [ ] Create .github/workflows/go-security.yaml that runs 'go mod verify' and 'go mod tidy --check' on every PR
  • [ ] Integrate nancy (github.com/sonatype-nexus-community/nancy) to scan go.mod for known vulnerabilities
  • [ ] Integrate gosec to scan cmd/ and pkg/ directories for security anti-patterns
  • [ ] Add go vet and staticcheck runs with failure on warnings to catch quality issues early

🌿Good first issues

  • Add integration tests for the 80+ utility functions listed in README: currently no dedicated test file visible in top 60 entries; pick 5 functions (e.g., nmap wrapper, tmux session, SARIF parser) and write table-driven Go tests under internal/func or pkg/func to improve coverage.
  • Document the workflow YAML schema with JSON Schema artifact: docs/api/ has README.mdx but no formal schema definition; generate a JSON Schema from the pongo2 template parser (osm-settings.yaml.j2) to enable IDE validation and OpenAPI tooling, saving new users hours of YAML debugging.
  • Add telemetry/observability examples to docs/api/README.mdx: project has Prometheus (prometheus/client_golang) and Telegram support but no worked example of scraping metrics or setting up alerting; add 2-3 runnable examples (Prometheus query, Grafana dashboard config, Telegram webhook).

Top contributors

Click to expand

📝Recent commits

Click to expand
  • 9f95043 — chore(registry): bump tool versions and rename httpx to pd-httpx (j3ssie)
  • f467fa3 — ci: mirror nightly OOM fixes in manual release (parallelism=1, GOMEMLIMIT, -trimpath) (j3ssie)
  • 1c9963f — ci: drop nightly to parallelism=1, add GOMEMLIMIT and -trimpath, remove tidy hook (j3ssie)
  • 418c52f — ci: fix nightly release OOM by limiting goreleaser parallelism (j3ssie)
  • cda49b3 — ci: upgrade goreleaser action to v7, improve nightly CI, and tag optional binaries (j3ssie)
  • 52b4f05 — feat: auto-install pulumi cli and adjust ssh retry configuration (j3ssie)
  • 69e3be2 — feat: add passive security scanning modules for frameworks and APIs (j3ssie)
  • 9f9f107 — build: update docker-build target to use explicit Dockerfile path (j3ssie)
  • 7804579 — docs: add cloud setup and query commands documentation (j3ssie)
  • a0a198d — Merge pull request #302 from tair-m/patch-1 (j3ssie)

🔒Security observations

  • High · Outdated Go Version — go.mod. The project specifies 'go 1.26.0' which appears to be a future/non-existent version. This could indicate a configuration error or use of development builds, which may contain unpatched vulnerabilities. Fix: Use a stable, officially released Go version (e.g., 1.22, 1.23). Verify the build configuration and update to the latest stable release.
  • High · Hardcoded SSH Test Keys — build/docker/ssh-test/id_ed25519. SSH private key file 'id_ed25519' is present in the repository at 'build/docker/ssh-test/'. Even though it's in a test directory, storing private keys in version control is a critical security risk. Fix: Remove the private key from the repository immediately. Add it to .gitignore. Use temporary/ephemeral keys for testing or generate them at runtime. Rotate any exposed keys.
  • High · Incomplete Dependency Declaration — go.mod. The go.mod file appears truncated - 'github.com/pulumi' dependency is incomplete. This prevents proper dependency resolution and may hide vulnerable packages. Fix: Complete the go.mod file with all dependencies. Run 'go mod tidy' to ensure all dependencies are properly declared and versions are pinned.
  • Medium · Environment Configuration Files — build/docker/.env.example. The presence of '.env.example' and configuration templates suggests environment variables are used for sensitive data. If actual .env files are committed, secrets could be exposed. Fix: Ensure .env files are in .gitignore. Use only .env.example with placeholder values. Implement secret management (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, cloud provider secret managers) for production deployments.
  • Medium · Multiple Docker Configurations — build/docker/. Multiple Dockerfiles with different configurations (dev, canary, production, toolbox) increase the attack surface. Inconsistent security configurations across these files could lead to vulnerabilities. Fix: Audit all Dockerfile variants for security best practices. Ensure production Dockerfile uses minimal base images, non-root users, and security scanning. Document differences between configurations.
  • Medium · AWS SDK Usage Without Explicit Security Review — go.mod (aws-sdk-go-v2 dependencies). The project uses AWS SDK v2 (aws-sdk-go-v2) with EC2 and STS services. Without visible IAM permission validation, there's risk of privilege escalation or unauthorized resource access. Fix: Implement least-privilege IAM policies for AWS credentials. Use AWS SigV4 signing. Enable CloudTrail logging. Regularly audit permissions and access patterns.
  • Medium · Redis Event Broker Without Visible Authentication — internal/broker/redis_event.go. Redis event broker is used (internal/broker/redis_event.go) but connection security is not visible in provided files. Redis typically requires authentication configuration. Fix: Ensure Redis requires password authentication or runs behind a firewall. Use Redis AUTH command. Consider Redis over TLS/SSL (redis-tls). Implement network segmentation.
  • Medium · Telegram Bot API Integration — go.mod (go-telegram-bot-api/telegram-bot-api/v5). Telegram bot API token is likely stored as environment variable or configuration. Exposure could allow bot hijacking or unauthorized notifications. Fix: Never hardcode API tokens. Use secret management. Implement token rotation. Log API access. Restrict bot permissions to minimum required scope.
  • Medium · Cloud Provider Credentials Handling — build/infra/templates/, internal/cloud/. Support for AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, Hetzner, and Linode indicates multiple cloud credential management points. Improper handling could expose cloud infrastructure. Fix: Use cloud provider IAM roles and service accounts instead of static credentials. Implement credential rotation. Use encrypted secret storage. Audit cloud access patterns.
  • Low · Self-Update Mechanism — undefined. The Fix: undefined

LLM-derived; treat as a starting point, not a security audit.


Generated by RepoPilot. Verdict based on maintenance signals — see the live page for receipts. Re-run on a new commit to refresh.

Healthy signals · j3ssie/osmedeus — RepoPilot