psf/requests · Security & risks

Authoritative risk signals for psf/requests — dependency CVEs (deps.dev), OpenSSF Scorecard, and GitHub Code Scanning. Not a substitute for your own security review.

Architecture Security & risks Dependencies License Maintenance Alternatives Vs Full analysis →

Dependency CVEs (deps.dev)

Critical

0 direct

High

0 direct

Moderate

Deps scanned

4 direct

OpenSSF Scorecard · 8.3/10

Branch-Protection—
CII-Best-Practices0/10
Signed-Releases0/10
Pinned-Dependencies6/10
Code-Review8/10
Maintained10/10
Security-Policy10/10
Dangerous-Workflow10/10

Ask AI about psf/requests

Grounded in the actual source code. Pick a starter question or write your own.

What does this repo do, in one paragraph?How would I get started using it?What are the main alternatives?Show me the entry point.

Or write your own question →

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis; they can be incomplete or stale. Not professional, security, or legal advice.