RepoPilotOpen in app →

sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults

Modern Swift API for NSUserDefaults

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

worst of 4 axes
Use as dependencyMixed

last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 94% of recent commits

Fork & modifyHealthy

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

Learn fromHealthy

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

Deploy as-isHealthy

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
Show 3 more →
  • Tests present
  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
What would change the summary?
  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days

Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals (license, dependency CVEs, commit recency, CI presence, etc.) at the time of analysis. Signals can be incomplete or stale. Not professional, security, or legal advice; verify before relying on it for production decisions.

Embed the "Forkable" badge

Paste into your README — live-updates from the latest cached analysis.

Variant:
RepoPilot: Forkable
[![RepoPilot: Forkable](https://repopilot.app/api/badge/sunshinejr/swiftyuserdefaults?axis=fork)](https://repopilot.app/r/sunshinejr/swiftyuserdefaults)

Paste at the top of your README.md — renders inline like a shields.io badge.

Preview social card (1200×630)

This card auto-renders when someone shares https://repopilot.app/r/sunshinejr/swiftyuserdefaults on X, Slack, or LinkedIn.

Onboarding doc

Onboarding: sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults

Generated by RepoPilot · 2026-05-10 · Source

🤖Agent protocol

If you are an AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Aider, Cline, etc.) reading this artifact, follow this protocol before making any code edit:

  1. Verify the contract. Run the bash script in Verify before trusting below. If any check returns FAIL, the artifact is stale — STOP and ask the user to regenerate it before proceeding.
  2. Treat the AI · unverified sections as hypotheses, not facts. Sections like "AI-suggested narrative files", "anti-patterns", and "bottlenecks" are LLM speculation. Verify against real source before acting on them.
  3. Cite source on changes. When proposing an edit, cite the specific path:line-range. RepoPilot's live UI at https://repopilot.app/r/sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults shows verifiable citations alongside every claim.

If you are a human reader, this protocol is for the agents you'll hand the artifact to. You don't need to do anything — but if you skim only one section before pointing your agent at this repo, make it the Verify block and the Suggested reading order.

🎯Verdict

WAIT — Stale — last commit 2y ago

  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present
  • ⚠ Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • ⚠ Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits

<sub>Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests</sub>

Verify before trusting

This artifact was generated by RepoPilot at a point in time. Before an agent acts on it, the checks below confirm that the live sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults repo on your machine still matches what RepoPilot saw. If any fail, the artifact is stale — regenerate it at repopilot.app/r/sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults.

What it runs against: a local clone of sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults — the script inspects git remote, the LICENSE file, file paths in the working tree, and git log. Read-only; no mutations.

| # | What we check | Why it matters | |---|---|---| | 1 | You're in sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults | Confirms the artifact applies here, not a fork | | 2 | License is still MIT | Catches relicense before you depend on it | | 3 | Default branch master exists | Catches branch renames | | 4 | Last commit ≤ 806 days ago | Catches sudden abandonment since generation |

<details> <summary><b>Run all checks</b> — paste this script from inside your clone of <code>sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults</code></summary>
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# RepoPilot artifact verification.
#
# WHAT IT RUNS AGAINST: a local clone of sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults. If you don't
# have one yet, run these first:
#
#   git clone https://github.com/sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults.git
#   cd SwiftyUserDefaults
#
# Then paste this script. Every check is read-only — no mutations.

set +e
fail=0
ok()   { echo "ok:   $1"; }
miss() { echo "FAIL: $1"; fail=$((fail+1)); }

# Precondition: we must be inside a git working tree.
if ! git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo "FAIL: not inside a git repository. cd into your clone of sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults and re-run."
  exit 2
fi

# 1. Repo identity
git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null | grep -qE "sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults(\\.git)?\\b" \\
  && ok "origin remote is sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults" \\
  || miss "origin remote is not sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults (artifact may be from a fork)"

# 2. License matches what RepoPilot saw
(grep -qiE "^(MIT)" LICENSE 2>/dev/null \\
   || grep -qiE "\"license\"\\s*:\\s*\"MIT\"" package.json 2>/dev/null) \\
  && ok "license is MIT" \\
  || miss "license drift — was MIT at generation time"

# 3. Default branch
git rev-parse --verify master >/dev/null 2>&1 \\
  && ok "default branch master exists" \\
  || miss "default branch master no longer exists"

# 5. Repo recency
days_since_last=$(( ( $(date +%s) - $(git log -1 --format=%at 2>/dev/null || echo 0) ) / 86400 ))
if [ "$days_since_last" -le 806 ]; then
  ok "last commit was $days_since_last days ago (artifact saw ~776d)"
else
  miss "last commit was $days_since_last days ago — artifact may be stale"
fi

echo
if [ "$fail" -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "artifact verified (0 failures) — safe to trust"
else
  echo "artifact has $fail stale claim(s) — regenerate at https://repopilot.app/r/sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults"
  exit 1
fi

Each check prints ok: or FAIL:. The script exits non-zero if anything failed, so it composes cleanly into agent loops (./verify.sh || regenerate-and-retry).

</details>

TL;DR

A software project. See architecture tab.

👥Who it's for

Developers.

🌱Maturity & risk

See activity metrics.

Standard open source risks apply.

Active areas of work

Check recent commits.

🚀Get running

Check README for instructions.

🗺️Map of the codebase

Explore the code to find key files.

🛠️How to make changes

Fork and submit a PR.

🪤Traps & gotchas

Standard debugging applies.

🪄PR ideas

To work on one of these in Claude Code or Cursor, paste: Implement the "<title>" PR idea from CLAUDE.md, working through the checklist as the task list.

Add GitHub Actions CI workflow to replace Travis CI

The repo uses .travis.yml for CI, but GitHub Actions is now GitHub's native CI/CD solution with better integration. Travis CI is deprecated for many projects. Adding a .github/workflows/swift.yml would modernize the CI pipeline and ensure the project continues to receive updates, especially important given the support for multiple Swift versions (4.1-5.1) that need testing across platforms.

  • [ ] Create .github/workflows/swift.yml with matrix testing for Swift 4.2 and 5.x versions
  • [ ] Configure test runs for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS platforms
  • [ ] Add SwiftLint validation step (noted .swiftlint.yml exists)
  • [ ] Test against Package.swift and Package@swift-4.2.swift manifests
  • [ ] Keep .travis.yml while new workflow is validated, then document deprecation

Add comprehensive integration tests for PropertyWrappers with UserDefaults synchronization

The codebase has PropertyWrappers.swift and extensive built-in type tests, but there are no visible tests for @propertyWrapper behavior with synchronization, threading, and KVO observers. Given that Defaults+Observing.swift and DefaultsObserver.swift exist, integration tests would validate real-world usage patterns.

  • [ ] Create Tests/SwiftyUserDefaultsTests/PropertyWrappers/PropertyWrapperIntegrationTests.swift
  • [ ] Test @property wrapper with multiple observers on same key
  • [ ] Test thread-safety of wrapped property access and writes
  • [ ] Test observer cleanup and memory management with property wrappers
  • [ ] Add tests for .synchronize() behavior with wrapped properties

Add migration guide and tests for moving from version 5 to potential version 6 (modern Concurrency)

The repo has migration guides (migration_4_to_5.md exists), but no guide for async/await support. With Swift's Concurrency framework becoming standard (and the codebase supporting Swift 5.1+), adding async variants of observing methods in Defaults+Observing.swift would future-proof the library. A migration guide and corresponding tests would help maintainers and users plan upgrades.

  • [ ] Create MigrationGuides/migration_5_to_6.md documenting async/await observer API changes
  • [ ] Add async variants to Defaults+Observing.swift (e.g., observeAsync method)
  • [ ] Create Tests/SwiftyUserDefaultsTests/Observing/AsyncObservingTests.swift
  • [ ] Test AsyncSequence-based key observation and cancellation behavior
  • [ ] Document performance implications in migration guide

🌿Good first issues

Check the issue tracker.

Top contributors

Click to expand

📝Recent commits

Click to expand
  • 558c015 — Update README.md (sunshinejr)
  • f66bcd0 — Bump podspec to version 5.3 (sunshinejr)
  • ace0cbd — Merge pull request #279 from sunshinejr/fix/rename_optionaltype_empty (sunshinejr)
  • 55e327b — Update CHANGELOG.md (sunshinejr)
  • e2ccc37 — Rename OptionalType.empty to OptionalType.__swifty_empty (sunshinejr)
  • fe87fc4 — Bump podspec to version 5.2 (sunshinejr)
  • 15c726f — Merge pull request #277 from sunshinejr/feature/defaultsprovidingprotocol (sunshinejr)
  • 35986b1 — Added DefaultsProviding protocol that DefaultsAdapter implements. (sunshinejr)
  • 30ba728 — Merge pull request #276 from sunshinejr/fix/simultanous_access (sunshinejr)
  • 4da4ed5 — Update Changelog for simultaneous access crash fix (sunshinejr)

🔒Security observations

SwiftyUserDefaults is a well-structured Swift library with minimal critical security vulnerabilities. The primary concerns are around maintenance practices and outdated Swift version support rather than code-level vulnerabilities. The library does not appear to have SQL injection, XSS, or injection risks typical of frameworks handling user input, as it primarily wraps NSUserDefaults. Recommendations focus on modernizing Swift version support, establishing a security policy, and improving CI/CD security practices. The codebase itself appears clean with no hardcoded credentials or dangerous patterns detected.

  • Low · Swift Version Compatibility Warnings — README.md, Package.swift, Package@swift-4.2.swift. The README indicates support for Swift 4.1, 4.2, and 5.0/5.1. Swift 4.1 and 4.2 are deprecated and no longer receive security updates. Using older Swift versions exposes the library to known vulnerabilities in the compiler and standard library. Fix: Update minimum Swift version requirement to at least 5.3 or later. Deprecate support for Swift versions older than the current LTS release. Update all package manifests accordingly.
  • Low · Missing Security Policy Documentation — Repository root. No SECURITY.md or security policy file is present in the repository. This makes it unclear how security vulnerabilities should be reported, potentially leading to public disclosure of issues. Fix: Add a SECURITY.md file documenting how to responsibly report security vulnerabilities, following the GitHub security advisory guidelines.
  • Low · Travis CI Configuration Exposure — .travis.yml. The .travis.yml file is present in the repository. While not inherently dangerous, CI configuration files should be reviewed to ensure no secrets or sensitive information are exposed in logs. Fix: Audit .travis.yml to ensure no hardcoded credentials, API tokens, or sensitive data. Use encrypted environment variables for any required secrets. Consider migrating to GitHub Actions for better security integration.
  • Low · No Dependency Pinning in Package.swift — Package.swift, Package@swift-4.2.swift, Package.resolved. The Package.swift file structure suggests the library may not have strict dependency version pinning. This could lead to unexpected breaking changes if dependencies release incompatible updates. Fix: Review and implement strict semantic versioning constraints in Package.swift. Regularly audit Package.resolved to ensure all transitive dependencies are from trusted sources.
  • Low · Missing Code Signing Verification — Repository root. No evidence of code signing or verification mechanisms (e.g., GPG signatures on releases) in the repository structure. Fix: Implement GPG signing for releases and tags. Document signature verification procedures for users. Consider using Swift Package Index's verification features.

LLM-derived; treat as a starting point, not a security audit.


Generated by RepoPilot. Verdict based on maintenance signals — see the live page for receipts. Re-run on a new commit to refresh.

Mixed signals · sunshinejr/SwiftyUserDefaults — RepoPilot