RepoPilot

ultraworkers/claw-code · Security & risks

Authoritative risk signals for ultraworkers/claw-code — dependency CVEs (deps.dev), OpenSSF Scorecard, and GitHub Code Scanning. Not a substitute for your own security review.

ArchitectureSecurity & risksDependenciesLicenseMaintenanceAlternativesVsFull analysis →

Dependency CVEs (deps.dev)

0
Critical
0 direct
0
High
0 direct
1
Moderate
50
Deps scanned
0 direct

OpenSSF Scorecard · 6.0/10

  • Branch-Protection—
  • Dependency-Update-Tool0/10
  • SAST0/10
  • Pinned-Dependencies2/10
  • Code-Review2/10
  • Maintained10/10
  • License10/10
  • CI-Tests10/10

Ask AI about ultraworkers/claw-code

Grounded in the actual source code. Pick a starter question or write your own.

What does this repo do, in one paragraph?How would I get started using it?What are the main alternatives?Show me the entry point.
Or write your own question →

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis; they can be incomplete or stale. Not professional, security, or legal advice.